of !

 
Author Message
Omadeus





Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 13:07    

and Che immediately ?)
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 23:09    

Denis writes:
and Che immediately ?)
Well “” fellow… before the language of the type “its person” like thus
Back to top
 
Omadeus





Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:21    

that I comprehended)))I simply at the point of took
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 20:05    

Here, of small “” for the best understanding:
+1
It is completely agreeable with the lecturer.
5 balls!
see “ of ”
!
As militant I cannot remain aside!
To #&, give two!
Respected author! I am shaken up to the deep fibers of soul. It will not hinder you to repeat?
of !
, creator! , creator! You - Prometheus our days!
are foot !
Respected author! It would be desirable in greater detail to acquaint for the sake of your creativity.
drink to !
Your literary talent needs essential modification.
Accordion of . () ]
The basic aspects of your creativity were repeatedly revealed by other authors.
! (.) ,
see “!”
Before Bobruysk, !
Undoubtedly, your strange world view of beside you concealed and tendency down to the remote journeys.
Before !
Your collaboration before the discussion contaminiates the atmosphere. I consider it appropriate to state to you which is worth manufacturing struggle with you for the sake of your methods.
Before ! At the point of !
From all hot heart and flame of militant (see “! ”) I wish before this commentary to express my consumer inclinations.
!
It carried beside the journal of business meetings.
Before !
Make it possible to in proper time be introduced to each your new masterpiece, since your ideals and world view are very close to my.
To #&!
It carried beside the journal of personal rendezvous.





Such categorical statements must not remain unpunished!





see “!”





see “”
, . percent)
Your product led me down the violent emotional incline.

1. on (see “! ”)
2. Livejourman.cam
!
see “ they are foot ”
you r?
Your tendency to prove its superiority based on the example of others appears simply abominably!
!
see “ they are foot ”
taxi!
Make it possible to agree with the previously expressing themselves reviewers.
/
1. you introduced nothing new. The basic moments of your creativity are encountered even in Ptolemy.
2. this creative product calls to mind the substance, extracted before the process of defecation, and its creator, in all likelihood, he consists besides the delicate and complex interrelations with the entire remaining world.
Pictures are not loaded!
I fear, that against the present moment, because of the problems with the higher service, your creative thought is deprived of demonstrative illustration based on examples.
To !
Excessive emotionalism of before you the potential victim of mockeries.
Class !
I am sincerely enraptured by your designer abilities.
.
Narration is filled for the sake of the spirit of daily activity.
Niasilyl.
1. unfortunately, in connection with the absence of free time, it is forced to put off familiarization with the data by product.
2. reading this product threw down me beside the frustration.
IT IS NOT RIDICULOUS!!!
see “ drink to ”
!
I do not belong to your purposeful audience, and, correspondingly, me little touches the creativity, proposed by you.

Make it possible to do small lyric digression.
!
Your creativity gives birth to before my soul scandalous contradictions.
The first, !
1. author, you - leader before this genre!
2. occurring possibility to initiate the process of review makes to me honor.
! (.) .
The tears of enthusiasm and tender emotion seemed after the reading of note on my eyes.

of your mental development repels any desire to discuss with you beyond this theme.
Under the cat!
The size of your text, it seems, defeats its value, the comprehension of situation it suggests about the need for the contraction of its visible unit by applying the special means.
#&, thanks!
The reading this opus supplied to me the satisfaction, compared with the sexual.
me!
Make it possible to lease advertizing place before your nearest postings.
!
I please forgiveness, but it is forced temporarily to be removed, to check the journal of personal rendezvous.
!
Your product was reflected before the depth of my soul.
To !
At the point of you it was possible to provoke me.
() ]
see “accordion”.





It is forced to establish the fact of my irrefutable rightness before this discussion, the discussion I consider unsuitable.
Theme % is not revealed.
1. I would recommend the stimulating of attention before the more detailed utilization as far as erotic component in this work.
2. aspects require further study.
It is allowed the use of revolution with any it is real. (.., .), theme of which is not revealed. Examples: “The theme of is not revealed”, “the theme of vodka is not revealed”.
!
From the content of your product it paralyzes me for the sake of fear.
Teach Albanian!
The boundedness of your speech does not permit at the point of us to continue contact against the proper level.
To !
1. author, you, before my opinion, enter beside the cohort of leaders before this genre.
2. I let I only one of the individuals before the number of first decade period of reviewers, but this “not” does not a bit throw down me beside the frustration.
To who is above and lower- $&#.
I express complete unconformity for the sake of the conformism of majority.
To !
Product it is written hotly (see “ of ”) and it is topical (see “”).
To !





Bigot, kill itself!
see “ drink to ”
, !





Addition)
Well still I will lay out so to be:
grit- son against the father arrived,
and the crumb requested:
that such “ ”
(I do understand badly)?
i listening posts do not have,
so that they would learn everything -
dad this response
I will place before the log…
if from the story of
ten days in succession,
that they will write: ,
DRINK .
there was the reader of ,
loudly entire office?
they will say: FIVE! !
or: .
if post is blacker ferrous than the urn,
it is more terrible than the sleep of neurotic,
it not to the time not OF ,
this, type, GOTHICS.
if fellow looks
by wolf, and it dreams: I will crash
fellow - do not associate for long,
this - !
if you endlessly,
only for the sake of the fact it is occupied,
know - this fine person
.
and you will publish the photo
in the form ,
someone immediately will ask
to put to use cat.
if who is concretely blunt,
it is feeble-minded fearfully,
they advise to it
TO LEARN ALBANIAN.
well and if the author is steep,
and not only based on the form,
they write here about similar:
it - ehlite.
someone, although itself inch,
to argue does not fear,
clever debater - it is good,
before the life of .
they will begin before the dispute to ,
/, it is said, defense,
it is necessary immediately to say:
POINT. DRAIN .
someone writes FIRST ,
someone writes FOR THE SAKE OF ,
in someone ,
small calibr.
someone requests money beside the duty,
to peace, yes on ,
someone knows before the jokes sense,
it entertains public.
someone simply thus became accustomed,
who was mistaken by address,
in someone
(to me )…
boy comprehended all already,
and the crumb solved:
“this -
piece not for the oleaster ".
(It is edited by the author: On February 26, 2008 - 22:04: 28)
Back to top
 
kadrena_k





Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 07:44    

Helga33 it writes:
I at the point of the clean language
Che sometimes it is possible to on by language.
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:14    

Helga33 it writes:
Personally to me normal to associate not =) eye you will break down, until you read any one inverted inside out word
Personally I against such “mangling of language”. Agreeably there would be one “”, well so above it send “” and other to .
I at the point of the clean language
Simply they turn up some terribly…. I for example) "
(Addition)
Ti j writes:
WELL and as to is normal to associate with the people?
Well thus far problems ) " ) "
Back to top
 
kadrena_k





Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:22    

WELL and as to is normal to associate with the people?
Back to top
 
onty13





Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 13:38    

Personally to me normal to associate not =) eye you will break down, until you read any one inverted inside out word
Personally I against such “mangling of language”. Agreeably there would be one “”, well so above it send “” and other to .
I at the point of the clean language
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 09:56    

As you relate down “To , to , to and to to ! ”?
you do put to use “” before the contact?
about itself I will say that “yes”… before ()
But you?
Back to top
 
Omadeus





Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 08:50    

of Of are foot
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 20:12    

I think that sufficiently, then can more greatly I will lay out
Back to top
 
halyan6





Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 21:06    

not to to , not barky іє of і, z so beside і by of і, of і of to exchange not to “of є”, of .
I will say such: to іє on to that of іі, for the є , to if “” people to і і of і і.
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 15:44    

it writes:
if “” people to і і of і і.





We that at the point of mudflow before 8-9, some are later…
I before generally sit recently….
But they beside 6 years to you as to pass play, moreover with the complete terminology before the English, although English and they
Back to top
 
halyan6





Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:51    

well C untruth. I read і. і і to і not of іє.
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 18:50    

I bore in mind junior generation .....
I also read, moreover very often, but those who to no longer….by them no longer it is interesting
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 18:46    

it writes:
to exchange not to “є
and to to ? for to exchange C to one і of і of і, if to religious rite і , і є to hour to і above
Back to top
 
halyan6





Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:06    

for to exchange C to one і of і of і, if to religious rite і , і є to hour to і above
on -є if to religious rite , then to is correct і to one letter there, de to і. і of that і of і of of і is simple z by - not і of .
(It is edited by the author: On February 22, 2008 - 19:35: 58)
Back to top
 
Mayonka





Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 16:01    

of і of ії of - і on subject about beside ії - “єє, єєє!”
Back to top
 
vorcug





Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 08:49    

and I became accustomed down I so, that already use him before the real life and even trained,
some count me “not that”, but I do not think that this actually so is terrible.
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:21    

But another time, so generally abstract to open terribly
Back to top
 
Crotcx





Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 23:32    

mAESTro
!!!!
the generally language of , but under the mood and before will roll!





But another time, so generally abstract to open terribly
is precise!
Back to top
 
VozZA





Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 04:18    

to
Back to top
 
Guto





Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 04:44    

it occurs I use also before the speech: , , , to /, ! , f Bobruysk animal, to , of , to .
(Addition)
oh! “”! she forgot) "
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 07:29    

of , , and the like sometimes helps from ill-wishers .....
Back to top
 
dlaf1924





Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 23:51    

In my opinion this is simple not respect for Slav written language…
Back to top
 
mAESDlo





Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 18:48    

For to і to , down my small pillow….





і of і that і, to beside ї abstracts і the robots of 4ever, 2day і the like, і to to if the teacher of є of їі of ….
I think of , і of of ї of to beside і “and ana to it - of ! , and he by f it - ! of ! ”, then there without to to і
Back to top
 



Powered by phpBB © 2001- 2008 phpBB Group